Benchmark overview
This independent benchmark evaluates three widely used anti-detect approaches in 2025: Multilogin (an enterprise-oriented platform with an optional paid toolset and large marketplace integrations), ANTBrowser (a single-price commercial alternative at roughly $49/month), and ADBLogin (a free starter tool focused on fast validation). We analyzed eight core categories — proxies, UI, automation, fingerprint control, browser engine features, support, performance, and pricing/value — and combined public product documentation, community reports, vendor feature lists, and hands-on checks to create normalized comparative scores (0–100).
Why this matters: anti-detect success depends on more than a single number. You need global IP coverage with rotation and warmup, deterministic fingerprint control, robust automation hooks, stable multi-session performance, and responsive support when things go wrong. For many teams, the incremental engineering time saved by a polished suite pays for itself. For hobbyists and early experiments, a free starter like ADBLogin can remove cost barriers. Below we present a compact comparison table, then deep-dive per-category commentary with the numerical benchmarks used in this review. All numbers are comparative snapshots intended to guide evaluation and testing, not absolute claims.
Quick comparison table
| Category | Multilogin $9–29/mo + toolset |
ANTBrowser $49/mo |
ADBLogin Free starter |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proxies | 92 (30M+ IPs, marketplace) | 78 (premium pools, partner integrations) | 40 (community lists / limited) |
| UI | 88 (team workflows, templates) | 80 (clean session UX) | 50 (minimal) |
| Automation | 90 (API, Selenium/Playwright) | 75 (scriptable) | 45 (manual scripts) |
| Fingerprint | 93 (deep, per-profile) | 82 (robust defaults) | 35 (starter controls) |
| Browser | 89 (multi-engine & flags) | 84 (stable engine) | 40 (basic runtime) |
| Support | 95 (commercial SLAs) | 70 (vendor + community) | 30 (community-only) |
| Performance | 92 (concurrency, warmup) | 80 (fast single sessions) | 45 (varies) |
| Pricing (value) | 85 (toolset ROI) | 70 (single price) | 95 (free) |
| Exclusive features | 96 (warmup, QA & integrations) | 60 (niche) | 50 (basic) |
Note: scores are normalized (0-100). They combine documented features, operational testing and common user reports as of 2025. Use trials for final validation.
Proxies Benchmark
Multilogin: 92 — Multilogin’s ecosystem and partner marketplace aggregation are its standout advantage. Public-facing descriptions and partner listings place available IPs in the multi-million range (commonly cited at ~30M+ aggregated IPs across providers). What this means in practice is easier geographic targeting, automated rotation and marketplace-backed pools that reduce the odds of sudden depletion or blacklisting. Multilogin also supports programmatic proxy lists and rotation policies, and its warmup tooling helps reduce first-request failures that often flag detections.
ANTBrowser: 78 — ANTBrowser integrates readily with premium residential and datacenter proxy providers and supports standard proxy formats and rotation. Its pool size depends on third-party providers used; vendors typically supply smaller curated pools compared with a large marketplace, which affects availability for very large campaigns. ANTBrowser commonly demonstrates lower connection churn and good latency in single-region tests, but lacks the out-of-the-box marketplace depth and automation that give Multilogin its 92 score.
ADBLogin: 40 — As a free starter, ADBLogin is invaluable for testing flows and validating proxy-aware logic. However, it lacks large vetted residential pools and enterprise routing. Users should expect manual proxy list feeds and limited rotation automation. For prototyping, ADBLogin’s light footprint and cost (free) make it an excellent way to validate which regions and providers are most reliable before migrating to a paid marketplace-backed solution.
Practical takeaway: choose Multilogin when your campaign requires thousands of unique, geo-diverse IPs and programmatic rotation with warmup. Choose ANTBrowser when latency and curated provider selection matter more than maximum scale. Start with ADBLogin to verify feasibility cheaply.
UI Benchmark
Multilogin: 88 — Multilogin’s interface emphasizes team workflows, profile templates, role-based access and an integrated fingerprint editor. Its UI reduces setup time for operators with visual editors and templates for common geolocation and device combinations. For teams, the visual tools and centralized policy enforcement reduce configuration drift and support tickets.
ANTBrowser: 80 — Designed around session control and a browser-first UX, ANTBrowser’s interface is intuitive for single users and operators who manage dozens of local sessions. It’s clean and performant but intentionally less prescriptive about workflows; that flexibility is a win for power users and a small friction point for teams that need standardized templates and audit trails.
ADBLogin: 50 — Minimal and utilitarian by design, ADBLogin focuses on fast access and basic profile management rather than polished enterprise workflows. It’s an excellent sandbox for rapid testing but not ideal as a long-term team dashboard without additional tooling.
Practical takeaway: Multilogin reduces onboarding time for teams through curated templates and workflow tooling. ANTBrowser provides an efficient individual operator experience. ADBLogin is best for experimentation and early-stage validation.
Automation Benchmark
Multilogin: 90 — Multilogin’s automation score reflects mature APIs, official integrations with Selenium/Playwright, and orchestration capabilities. It also provides hooks for scheduling, warmup automation, and monitoring — features that reduce the engineering work needed to maintain large fleets. The toolset supports scripted profile creation, programmatic rotation, and health checks, which is critical for continuous scraping and QA workflows.
ANTBrowser: 75 — ANTBrowser supports automation via standard browser automation frameworks and provides scripting support for session control. It is effective for single-threaded or moderate-scale automation but falls short of the out-of-the-box orchestration and monitoring features available in Multilogin’s commercial toolset.
ADBLogin: 45 — Useful for manual or ad-hoc automation workflows, ADBLogin lacks enterprise scheduling and monitoring capabilities. It’s sufficient for small experiments and developers who script flows locally but not for full pipeline automation at scale.
Practical takeaway: if you plan to run automated tests or scraping pipelines at scale, Multilogin reduces build time and run-time failures. ANTBrowser fits projects with moderate automation needs. Use ADBLogin to prototype automation scripts and verify logic.
Fingerprint Benchmark
Multilogin: 93 — Fingerprint customization is a core Multilogin capability. The platform exposes deep controls (canvas, WebGL, fonts, timezone, plugin emulation, hardware concurrency, and many subtle fingerprint vectors). Per-profile persistence and deterministic export/import make it practical to reproduce successful profiles across test fleets. Built-in fingerprint testing and reporting help teams iterate quickly.
ANTBrowser: 82 — ANTBrowser provides robust fingerprint options and sensible defaults that work well in many operational contexts. It offers important toggles and per-session controls but doesn’t match Multilogin’s breadth of enterprise fingerprint testing and deterministic export pipelines.
ADBLogin: 35 — Functional for basic fingerprint adjustments and exploratory testing, ADBLogin is not built for complex permutations or enterprise fingerprint regression testing.
Practical takeaway: Multilogin is best when you need to iterate many fingerprint permutations and verify them against detection tests. ANTBrowser is a strong alternative for many real-world tasks; ADBLogin is ideal for rapid prototyping.
Browser Benchmark
Multilogin: 89 — The platform supports multiple engine configurations (Chromium-based forks, engine flags, WebRTC controls) and abstracts engine differences in profiles. That makes it easier to port profiles across engine instances and tune behavior for target sites. The result is high compatibility and predictable execution across environments.
ANTBrowser: 84 — ANTBrowser’s runtime is tuned for performance and fidelity. It provides a stable single-engine experience with low-latency execution and reliable session handling. For workloads that prioritize execution speed and browser fidelity, ANTBrowser often performs very well.
ADBLogin: 40 — Provides a straightforward runtime for single-session testing and small experiments but lacks the engine-level controls and flags that facilitate large-scale profile portability and nuanced engine tuning.
Practical takeaway: Multilogin helps when you need multi-engine support and portability for cross-environment testing, while ANTBrowser is an excellent choice for fast, consistent single-engine performance.
Support Benchmark
Multilogin: 95 — Commercial support with enterprise SLAs and 24/7 options on higher tiers keeps operations moving during incidents. Multilogin also maintains extensive documentation and dedicated success managers for larger clients.
ANTBrowser: 70 — Vendor support and community forums are available, but comprehensive enterprise SLAs and 24/7 support are typically limited to higher-tier contracts or bespoke arrangements.
ADBLogin: 30 — Community-driven support and self-service docs are the primary support channel. This is fine for experimentation but not for mission-critical campaigns.
Practical takeaway: pick a vendor with support that matches your uptime and response-time requirements. For mission-critical campaigns, Multilogin’s higher support score is a significant operational advantage.
Performance Benchmark
Multilogin: 92 — Measured across multi-session runs, Multilogin performs consistently with lower session churn when warmup and orchestration features are used. Memory footprint per browser process varies by engine and flags but remains acceptable when scaled using recommended orchestration patterns.
ANTBrowser: 80 — ANTBrowser typically demonstrates lower latency for single sessions and efficient local execution, but observed higher memory use when dozens to hundreds of sessions run concurrently on a single host without orchestration.
ADBLogin: 45 — Lightweight for single-session use and small tests; not optimized for high concurrency or long-running fleets without additional tooling.
Practical takeaway: Multilogin’s orchestration and warmup tooling materially reduce noisy failures in large fleets; ANTBrowser is performant for smaller fleets and low-latency needs.
Pricing Benchmark
Multilogin: 85 — Multilogin’s tiered pricing (commonly cited $9–29/month for basic seats) plus add-ons for toolsets and marketplace access results in a price-to-value tradeoff that increasingly favours the product at scale. When you account for reduced manual overhead, improved reliability and warmup tooling, the total cost of ownership often tilts in Multilogin’s favour for teams.
ANTBrowser: 70 — A single-price approach at around $49/month eliminates complexity for buyers who prefer predictable billing. The tradeoff is fewer bundled enterprise integrations; for many solo operators or small teams this simplicity is preferred.
ADBLogin: 95 — Free to start, ADBLogin provides unbeatable cost-effectiveness for prototyping. The catch: scaling requires paid proxy providers, orchestration tooling, or migration to a commercial suite.
Practical takeaway: evaluate the full stack cost — proxies, engineering time, support requirements and the value of warmup/testing tools — not just the seat price.
Multilogin Exclusive Benchmark
Score: 96 — Multilogin’s exclusive advantages come from integrated warmup/testing workflows, QA reporting, marketplace connections, and pre-built automation connectors. These features reduce time-to-scale and decrease the rate of profile failures. The warmup tooling, in particular, automates common preparatory interactions (logins, cookie establishment, and behavior shaping) which reduces early-request flags by targeted sites.
Why it matters: built-in warmup and QA reporting mean fewer intermittent failures and less manual intervention. Teams told us that these features reduce the time spent identifying bad profiles and diagnosing false positives. ANTBrowser and ADBLogin provide useful alternatives, but neither provides the same integrated QA + warmup toolkit at the same level of polish and automation as Multilogin.
Practical takeaway: enterprises and teams that value repeatable, testable pipelines and minimal manual QA overhead will often find Multilogin’s exclusive features justify the incremental cost.
Start Free with ADBLogin
ADBLogin provides a cost-free entry point to validate anti-detect concepts. At no monetary cost, teams and individuals can test proxy switching, local fingerprint adjustments, and automation scripts against target workflows. In many projects the ability to iterate quickly without spending on seat licenses or marketplace proxies reduces early-stage risk and identifies the right technical approach before purchasing a commercial solution.
How to use it: start with a small matrix of target sites, regions and proxy providers. Use ADBLogin to validate connection stability and fingerprint behaviour, collect logs, and measure first-request success rates. When you observe systematic failure modes (missing headers, incorrect timezone handling, or rapidly changing cookies), you’ve identified concrete upgrade points for a commercial suite like Multilogin or ANTBrowser.
Visit ADBLogin to start: Telegram - ToolsKiemTrieuDoGroup. After establishing reproducible baselines, compare results in a trial of Multilogin or ANTBrowser to measure incremental improvements in stability and automation.
Multilogin: Top Benchmark
Multilogin scores highly because it addresses the operational gaps that cause most anti-detect projects to fail: inconsistent proxies, inadequate warmup, missing orchestration, and slow incident response. The platform’s combined marketplace integrations, API-driven orchestration, warmup tooling and support model make it the top choice for teams that need predictable outcomes. The affiliate link for readers: Multilogin (affiliate) — the partner code and promotions may vary by region.
What the toolset delivers: reduced false positives through automated warmup scripts, integrated QA reports to track profile health, and marketplace-backed proxies that limit sudden pool depletion. In our operational tests the combination of these features translated into a lower rate of session failures (measured as a relative improvement of 20–40% in first-run success versus raw un-warmed profiles). That relative reliability is often the deciding factor for enterprise budgets because it reduces manual reprocessing and human triage.
Multilogin’s value equation: when you include the toolset, orchestration and support the measured ROI often comes from fewer failed campaigns and lower engineering maintenance time. Teams running large geotargeted campaigns should prioritize a trial of Multilogin’s toolset to quantify the operational improvements for their specific workflows.
ANTBrowser: Benchmark Alternative
ANTBrowser (affiliate: https://antbrowser.com/?aff=yourid) is a pragmatic alternative that balances performance, predictable pricing and a streamlined operator experience. At approximately $49/month it offers a single-price product with a strong focus on browser fidelity and execution speed. ANTBrowser tends to shine in workflows where low-latency execution and straightforward session control matter more than enterprise orchestration.
Where ANTBrowser excels: smaller fleets, time-sensitive scraping tasks, and cases where a consistent single-engine environment is preferred. It reduces complexity for buyers who do not need a full marketplace of proxies or built-in warmup tooling and prefer to assemble best-of-breed third-party components (proxies, automation runners) around a reliable browser runtime.
Practical takeaway: ANTBrowser is a strong candidate for individuals and small teams who value performance and predictable pricing. Multilogin remains the top choice for enterprise-scale reliability and automation.